<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Journal of Seasonality</title><link>https://artaquest.org/research/</link><description>Open, reproducible, AI-reviewed studies that discover seasonality and cyclical patterns in open data.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Topics Seasonality Model: Fitting 22 Years of Worldwide Search Interest to Sidereal Cycles</title><link>https://artaquest.org/papers/topics-seasonality-model.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://artaquest.org/papers/topics-seasonality-model.html</guid><dc:creator>Arash Ashrafnejad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>We ask whether the timing of worldwide curiosity, measured by Google Trends, lines up with the positions of celestial bodies. For each of 1034 search fields - a curated atlas of skill terms (each derived from an ISCO-08 occupation, e.g. accountant -&gt; accounting) plus learning topics - we fit 22 year</description></item><item><title>Recency Bias in Google Trends: A Fitting-Power Criterion for Cropping the Recent Tail</title><link>https://artaquest.org/papers/google-trends-recency-bias.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://artaquest.org/papers/google-trends-recency-bias.html</guid><dc:creator>Arash Ashrafnejad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Google Trends&#x27; most recent observations are the least reliable - sampled from incomplete data and revised later. We quantify how much recent data a time-series model should discard using a pure in-sample fitting-power criterion: crop the most recent C months of data, refit on the remainder, and reco</description></item></channel></rss>